How to Understand Rule-Constituted Kinds

نویسندگان

چکیده

The paper distinguishes between two conceptions of kinds defined by constitutive rules, the one suggested Searle, and invoked Williamson to define assertion. Against recent arguments contrary Maitra, Johnson others, it argues for superiority latter in first place as an account games. On this basis, that alleged disanalogies real games language literature fact don’t exist. relies on Rawls’s distinction types (“blueprints”, Rawls called them) practices institutions those among them are actually force, hence truly normative; defends along Rawlsian lines a plurality norms apply actual instances rule-constituted practices, uses line block examples others provide sustain their case.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

First rule to improving clinical outcomes--understand how you are measured.

In undergoing this life, many people always try to do and get the best. New knowledge, experience, lesson, and everything that can improve the life will be done. However, many people sometimes feel confused to get those things. Feeling the limited of experience and sources to be better is one of the lacks to own. However, there is a very simple thing that can be done. This is what your teacher ...

متن کامل

How are Mathematical Objects Constituted? A Structuralist Answer

In my view, structuralism as presented by Shapiro (1991, 1997), Resnik (1991), and elsewhere offers the most plausible philosophy of mathematics: Mathematics is about structures, indeed it is the science of pure structures. Structures have no mysterious ontological status, and hence mathematics is not ontologically mysterious, either. Again, it is no mystery how we can acquire knowledge about s...

متن کامل

How many kinds of reasons?

Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opin...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Review of Philosophy and Psychology

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1878-5158', '1878-5166']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00576-z